Events

« August 2008
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31

User login

Get your own inworld RSS feeds - free!

Recent comments

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Second Life® is a registered trademark of Linden Lab® , as are the Eye-in-Hand logo®, Hexagon logo™, inSL Cube logo™, Linden™ dollar(s), Linden Lab Hexagon logo™, LindeX™ , Second Life Eye-in-Hand logo®, Second Life Grid™ development platform, Second Life Grid logo™, SL™, SL™ world, SL Grid™, SLurl™, Teen Second Life™, Teen Second Life Eye-in-Hand logo™,TSL™, WindLight®,Your World. Your Imagination.™

Arbitration Within SecondLife: E-Justice Center

Universidade de Aveiro 0Flitting in and out of Second Life media coverage is the Portuguese Ministry of Justice's e-Justice center - the misfortune of the timing being all the recent scandal in the financial sector of Second Life. Virtually Blind made mention of it some time ago (the comments have been very useful), as did Gwyneth Llewelyn - but I had no time to address it. Too many people wanted to chat inworld about the Ginko and WSE happenings; since this has died down I had the opportunity to do some poking around.

It's probably no coincidence that Portugal is now presiding over the European Union, something which is interesting considering Linden Lab was apparently not involved. Perhaps they don't understand the implications of Portugal's presence - but then, it is unlikely that anyone does understand the implications, including the Portugese Ministry of Justice.

In this translated post by Gustavo Felisberto, though, points to a problem that I mentioned just yesterday:

...How it is that the mediating ones go to proceed in cases with people of different countries? That rules or laws go to serve of base to this mediation? Of the countries of and-it executes it to center, the Americans (where are the servers) or all meetings?...

These are big questions, especially in the context of international laws and the implications in virtual worlds. So I did some digging, and found that the Arbitration and Mediation Rules of the e-Justice Center states, in Article 3, that the law of the seat is a Second Life adaptation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (which you can read the original of here). This is especially interesting because a virtual world could be a distinct possibility as a 'neutral area' - though as Ashcroft Burnham comments, arbitration will probably only be legally enforceable within Portugal itself, though Portugal's presidency over the European Union might broaden the net somehow.

But in the context of Second Life Business to Second Life Business transactions - where the Second Life businesses exist only within Second Life - will this be useful? While grounding in geopolitical jurisdiction of Law may be disputed, maybe it is time for more people to start considering how to deal with such issues - and whether Linden Lab can provide the necessary meta policy infrastructure to allow for resident-run policy infrastructures.




Comments

Hi there, nice article. Let me just comment a couple of sentences:

It's probably no coincidence that Portugal is now presiding over the European Union

Oh, believe me, it's a coincidence.

this translated post by Gustavo Felisberto

The referred post was written by Paula Simões and not Gustavo Felisberto.

SLUrl:

The SLUrl is here, for those who wish to poke around.