Age is just a number said someone who hasn't experienced the strangeness of hairs appearing in places that hair simply shouldn't grow, or has experienced the inexplicable oddity of nasal hair that grows at rates that make you think it's some sort of alien technology.
However a couple of articles in the newspapers have caught my eye this week. One in the Torygraph, I mean Telegraph, takes a sideswipe whilst the Guardian posts an article about educational conferencing.
Now these unrelated articles tell a story underneath the surface. The Telegraph article is about internet addiction and contains the following off the cuff comment:
"Sure, the armies of people that spend all day, every day on Second Life
really do need to get out more, but isn’t all that time on Facebook
actually a necessary part of organising an evening out for almost
anybody under 30?"
There you have it. Second Life isn't trendy for the under 30's? Quite possibly true, I don't meet that many people under 30, I certainly don't see many under 25, except those eighteen year old, "I'm legal honest" strippers who are probably a 53 year old guy called Burt from Idaho.
The Guardian article : "Is this the future of the academic conference?" on the other hand discusses the usefulness of Second Life for an education conference. The author however remains sceptical, but adds:
"Will it catch on? I'm sceptical, but then I didn't see the point of email at first."
The issue of cost savings is an important one, but the point is that the people who get excited about Second Life in education are not the students. The article is all about potential, Second Life is full of potential. One day newspapers the world over will realise it's "Linden Lab" rather than "Linden Labs" but that will be sometime in the future, probably around the time Linden Lab themselves remember they instigated a discussion about Openspaces and forgot to respond but I digress.
I don't really care that Facebook is considered trendy and Second Life isn't. I don't like Facebook or Myspace but they have their place and are useful to those who use them. Second Life is useful to me and I don't mind if it's full of thirtysomethings, that's part of the appeal. This is one of the reasons I hope they never merge the grids.
Linden Lab have a product here that appeals to a very wide spectrum of users, they have a market that a lot of companies aren't interested in. They should love, honour and cherish this userbase because they're onto something here. We aren't going away, we can be rational, we do still throw temper tantrums but we calm down quicker and give it another go.
Whether this was Linden Lab's intent or not, it's where we're at. Sometimes we don't thrill you, sometimes we think we'll kill you, but don't let us fuck up will you, because when we need a friend it's still you.
- Ciaran Laval's blog
- Add new comment
- 347 reads

Re: The age gap
I guess it's all about what people want to do. Facebook is overhyped, but in many ways I do find it more useful than a virtual world... mainly because I actually have people I know as friends (and not all those avatar-facebook hybrids), and also because it doesn't take too long to check.
Second Life is a little more involved when it comes to checking on the status of things. Blogs help. But nowhere is there a centralized area along the lines of 'what's up with the folks I know?'. This is where I think Linden Lab was trying to shove Second Life, but I don't think that they can get their heavyweight slimmed down enough to compete in the lightweight division.
Having been dabbling in other virtual worlds, I can honestly say that Linden Lab - on a technology level - is on top. But when it comes to policy, they're not. As the technological advantage shifts... if the policy stays constant... the generations that make up the interest in Second Life will shuffle along.
And so might some of the young ones.
Re: The age gap
i have always been proud of the way The Guardian dabbles with stories about Second Life. They're a reliable source in general, and have done quite a few various stories about SL in the past. I like that the writers at The Guardian keep an open realistic mind while still understanding that the people inside SL care about the world. We're not just losers wasting time.
Frankly... I think any journalist that is still writing stories about myspace and facebook are the losers that need to get a life.
Re: The age gap
Yup The Guardian has provided Second Life with a lot of good publicity.