Reply to comment

I just want to clarify my previous statment. I wasn't saying that VSTEX shouldn't get involved in the merger, I only meant that it shouldn't have that burden of oversight. They have done a great job of being dynamic and responding to situations quite well as they arose.

Looking back on my comment - man I was angry and typing fast after reading that. It pisses me off that CEOs take money from others and then act as though those people don't exist. There is no I in a public company, there is only WE. WE need to make decisions, not I thought about it and this is whats going to happen.

Ethics..

There was NO reason to ban BO from the meeting. NONE. Its a sl PUBLIC company. Perhaps Bo might have had interest in investing, OR maybe he had some great ideas that would have added value to the abysmal proposed merger process. At any rate, there are some deep pockets that Bo can tap into, both financially and mentally. It seems a shame that he was treated this way publicly.

At any rate, I guess this type of situation is best left up to those with skin in the game that care what happens to this company. I don't have any shares in this company and now I am glad I followed instinct on this one. I am sure Skip did what he thought would be best, the whole thing just seems like a selfish move that could have been avoided with a little more planning and development.